Photo listing showing signage (bad)

The highest rated, most recent photos are listed first. See also photomap view.

Photo #11451

#11451, nearby

Rating: 1

Elizabeth Road / Milton Road roundbout. Shared use pavement signate at Highworth Avenue is confusing.

Photo #1069

#1069, nearby

Rating: 1

Sign: "No Cars beyond this Point", and then there's a car there.

Photo #35411

#35411, nearby

Rating: 0

A sign agonizes about the compexity of providing sufficient cycle parking for students at the library, but pleasingly admits additional cycle parking will be provided in the summer.

Photo #35394

#35394, nearby

Rating: 0

PRIVATE PROPERTY Do not lock bicycles to these railings There are some decent cycle racks a little further down the road.

Photo #35318

#35318, nearby

Rating: 0

The sign on the lamp-post at the left suggests "Steal a bike!" in big letters. Its only if you go up and read the small print that it makes it clear this is some kind of iffy 'dare you' type crime reduction measure.

Photo #35283

#35283, nearby

Rating: 0

Denmark road is one way. no right of way from ravenmere to caxton rd

Photo #35284

#35284, nearby

Rating: 0

Denmark road is one way. no right of way from ravenmere to caxton rd

Photo #35226

#35226, nearby

Rating: 0

Mixed message: "Get off the pavement, except when its convenient for traffic management purposes." #35225 shows the other side of this sign, which invites riders onto the pavement.

Photo #35149

#35149, nearby

Rating: 0

Only in Cambridge? A gold coloured frame politely states the case for the privacy of this drainpipe. For more context see #35148. 66 on y' bike A message to our kind, thoughtful and considerate customers. Please do not under any ci ... [more]

Photo #35106

#35106, nearby

Rating: 0

Leaving a 20 mph zone, and enterring another one!

Photo #34798

#34798, nearby

Rating: 0

Tomorrow I'm going to ride around until I get stopped and claim that my wedding ring is bullion.

Photo #34689

#34689, nearby

Rating: 0

Come the floods, we'll be ready

Photo #34425

#34425, nearby

Rating: 0

There should be an Except Cycles plate under the No Right Turn sign - that's a contraflow cycle lane.

Photo #33923

#33923, nearby

Rating: 0

Euuugh! But at least there are some cycle racks nearby, see #33924 and #33921 - but maybe not enough it this sort of threat is needed.

Photo #33916

#33916, nearby

Rating: 0

This is the sort of confusing arrangement we had before the "Except Cycles" sign was permitted. The blue sign doesn't legally prohibit vehicles, but the road marking does say No Entry Except Cycles - so it is ambiguous. The new arrangeme ... [more]

Photo #33706

#33706, nearby

Rating: 0

Welcome to Stockport train station.

Photo #33346

#33346, nearby

Rating: 0

Curious sign that reads: STAFF & VISITOR BICYCLES ONLY points to a dire need for much more cycle parking for all. The people being excluded by this sign are the schoolchildren at the adjacent school. Appalling!

Photo #33345

#33345, nearby

Rating: 0

Annoying sign persecuting young would-be cyclists, where there's no similar ban on driving. See #33344. Also what does it mean to stride it? Presumably remain on the saddle and whisk along? And the middle bit is a 'No Cycling' sign, but ... [more]

Photo #33344

#33344, nearby

Rating: 0

The sign on this gate (see close-up in #33345) reads: STRIDE IT... DON'T RIDE IT! But curiously drivers of motor vehicles are not requested to get out and push.

Photo #33250

#33250, nearby

Rating: 0

Contradictory signage on Long Road

Photo #33217

#33217, nearby

Rating: 0

No Motor Vehicles signage for this contraflow

Photo #33174

#33174, nearby

Rating: 0

'Summer 2011' ?? and the cycle route was meant to open before the houses.

Photo #33013

#33013, nearby

Rating: 0

Sign reads: "Following a trial of the double tier rack, Westminster City Council and English Heritage have indicated their opposition to any use of such racking in a permanent design, as being too visability intrusive and not in keeping to ... [more]

Photo #33046

#33046, nearby

Rating: 0

It seems that surfers, like cyclists, suffer similar kinds of unwelcoming rules as to which trains they can take their equipment on board. But this information notice at Newquay Station has generated some chatter. Apparently First Great ... [more]

Photo #32837

#32837, nearby

Rating: 0

'No Entry except guided buses' to the cycleway??

Photo #32834

#32834, nearby

Rating: 0

No Entry except for authorised vehicles - how many cyclists will know they are authorised? (The Cambridge Gateway - not yet shown on OpenCycleMap)

Photo #32832

#32832, nearby

Rating: 0

No Entry except for authorised vehicles - how many cyclists will know they are authorised? (The Cambridge Gateway - not yet shown on OpenCycleMap)

Photo #32919

#32919, nearby

Rating: 0

No motor vehicles - at certain times - and with a long string of exceptions.

Photo #32734

#32734, nearby

Rating: 0

Shouldn't that be a No Entry Except Cycles sign?

Photo #32728

#32728, nearby

Rating: 0

Cycle Crossing signs for the Trans Pennine Trail at York racecourse - although the one to the left has been turned 180 degrees.

Photo #32568

#32568, nearby

Rating: 0

I have no idea why they bothered with a few metres of footway on the other side of the cycleway, let alone the pointless Cyclists Dismount signage.

Photo #32558

#32558, nearby

Rating: 0

Signs needed here to tell cyclists to turn left for the busway route.

Photo #32357

#32357, nearby

Rating: 0

I've no idea what the point of these markings is.

Photo #32351

#32351, nearby

Rating: 0

Surely this sign is the wrong way around? And why the obsession with making cyclists dismount to cross a lightly used busway anyway?

Photo #32239

#32239, nearby

Rating: 0

This notice has been put up along the corridor of the cycle park leading to the stairs and lifts where people leave their bikes if the racks are full. Clearly, more racks are needed.

Photo #32136

#32136, nearby

Rating: 0

This is a Notice of Change of Right of Way from a footpath to restricted byway issued by South Cambridge District Council for the route from here to Sawston. It asks for any objections to be raised by 25th May 2011, or about 2 months ago. ... [more]

Photo #34118

#34118, nearby

Rating: 0

Presumably cyclists are meant to leave the road and pass to the right of the sign - unclear.

Photo #34701

#34701, nearby

Rating: 0

This should be two-way for cycling (linking with a potential cut-through to the west).

Photo #31783

#31783, nearby

Rating: 0

The NO PEDESTRIANS sign here is right next to the footway that runs to the left of the crash barrier. Technically speaking a pedestrian using that path to cross the mouth of the on-ramp to the motorway is in violation of that signage. Surel ... [more]

Photo #31761

#31761, nearby

Rating: 0

No Through Road signs in Bothwell on NCN route 74 to Blantyre. Spot the NCN 74 route confirmation sign!

Photo #34115

#34115, nearby

Rating: 0

'Cycle Track Closed' - except it wasn't.

Photo #34108

#34108, nearby

Rating: 0

No cycling on the recreation ground, Bradford on Avon - although it would provide some very useful routes.

Photo #34097

#34097, nearby

Rating: 0

Cyclists certainly need to beware pedestrians here, but there's no need for a cycling ban.

Photo #34094

#34094, nearby

Rating: 0

Unnecessary cycle ban on a useful link in Marlborough.

Photo #34087

#34087, nearby

Rating: 0

Cycling is not encouraged in Marlborough

Photo #34020

#34020, nearby

Rating: 0

Lots of No Cycling signs on the path to Filton Abbey Wood - couldn't they just widen it?

Photo #34019

#34019, nearby

Rating: 0

Lots of No Cycling signs on the path to Filton Abbey Wood - couldn't they just widen it? And provide proper parking too?

Photo #31578

#31578, nearby

Rating: 0

Lots of space for car parking - but no space apparently for cycling - yet the presence of the mean spirited no cycling sign here does suggest there is a desire to use this as a convenient cut through!

Photo #31577

#31577, nearby

Rating: 0

The sign on the right says "Pedestrians be aware of construction traffic" - which is of course the wrong way around!

Photo #31572

#31572, nearby

Rating: 0

I suppose this cycle road marking is a reminder to drivers that cyclists exist? I don't know its actual significance. Coventry Road, Hinckley.

Photo #31570

#31570, nearby

Rating: 0

A well worn out no cycling sign, probably the reason for no dropped kerb here.

Photo #31562

#31562, nearby

Rating: 0

The no cycling sign here demonstrates that there is a desire for cycling along here, but that the need has not been met. It should be easily possible to make this a cyclable route - if there was the will.

Photo #31560

#31560, nearby

Rating: 0

Loads of room here could make a really convenient cut-through that is cyclable. The "No Cycling" symbol is really a sign that there is a desire for this to be cyclable, and that there is failed permeability and planning.

Photo #31492

#31492, nearby

Rating: 0

Random use of priority signs in housing estate. They were sent out with the correct 4 signs, but only 2 got put up the right way up and in the correct location!

Photo #31599

#31599, nearby

Rating: 0

The "CYCLISTS DISMOUNT" sign was removed after earlier complaints, but has reappeared. Presumably due to rightful complaints about pavement cyclists, but due to the ambiguous positioning partially on the highway, some drivers are assuming i ... [more]

Photo #31243

#31243, nearby

Rating: 0

Strange to have the End of Cycle Route sign before the bridge - are cyclists meant to dismount? Why are these signs needed anyway?

Photo #31132

#31132, nearby

Rating: 0

This is the only indication that this is open to cyclists.

Photo #31071

#31071, nearby

Rating: 0

You cycle to almost the end of the seafront cycle path and you hit a Cycling prohibited and cyclists dismount sign, with no way to get from there on to the road and further along the south coast cycle route. Ideally this would be changed su ... [more]

Photo #31056

#31056, nearby

Rating: 0

Second unnecessary sign on Broad Lane, Haslingfield.

Photo #31055

#31055, nearby

Rating: 0

Unnecessary and inaccurate sign on Broad Lane, Haslingfield

Photo #31006

#31006, nearby

Rating: 0

There shouldn't be a "Cyclists Dismount" sign here.

Photo #31005

#31005, nearby

Rating: 0

When planners give up planning: Cyclists dismount sign on a cycle route.

Photo #30622

#30622, nearby

Rating: 0

I haven't ever previously seen signs that actually say "Don't Cycle on the pavement" - in this case using a NO CYCLING sign - but with an extra line through it. A little further up the road, the pavement has been converted to permit paveme ... [more]

Photo #30480

#30480, nearby

Rating: 0

Patronizing sign whose aim seems to be avoidance of liability if a cyclist jolts their bike because there is a bit of a ramp ahead. Otherwise this is an excellent bridge.

Photo #30394

#30394, nearby

Rating: 0

Thank you Corporation of London. Cars and pedestrians are allowed to mix amicably in Wanstead Park, but ban cycling, this highly dangerous mode of transport. There isn't even cycle parking giving the message that you are not welcome at all ... [more]

Photo #30356

#30356, nearby

Rating: 0

Artistic response to finger wagging signage ! The top sign spells out in detail some archaic by-law that 'CYCLES MUST ONLY USE THE SPACES PROVIDED' blah blah blah. The main poster (which is now quite old and faded) announces CYCLE REMOVA ... [more]

Photo #30311

#30311, nearby

Rating: 0

'Beware oncoming cycles' sign needed

Photo #30310

#30310, nearby

Rating: 0

'Beware oncoming cycles' sign needed

Photo #32630

#32630, nearby

Rating: 0

No cycling (or roller-blading) across the central park in Interlaken - most unusual in switzerland.

Photo #30282

#30282, nearby

Rating: 0

Except cycles plate needed, or replace with Cycles only sign

Photo #30281

#30281, nearby

Rating: 0

Except cycles plate needed

Photo #30209

#30209, nearby

Rating: 0

Wrong sign. This should read 'Cycle lane closed'

Photo #30169

#30169, nearby

Rating: 0

Nonsense - motor vehicles aren't allowed in this direction anyway, whereas the street is in fact open as usual for cycling.

Photo #30109

#30109, nearby

Rating: 0

Cyclists Dismount! Why?

Photo #30454

#30454, nearby

Rating: 0

Why no cycling on this obvious route in Lambourn?

Photo #30052

#30052, nearby

Rating: 0

End of cycle route. Cyclists dismount. Why?

Photo #30051

#30051, nearby

Rating: 0

Cyclists dismount! Why?

Photo #30154

#30154, nearby

Rating: 0

'Cyclists Dismount' on NCN route 4 - why on earth, so far short of such a quiet dead-end road?

Photo #29963

#29963, nearby

Rating: 0

Why? Why?

Photo #30032

#30032, nearby

Rating: 0

End of Route - Cyclists Dismount - Carmarthenshire's legal department is as negative as Cambridgeshire's.

Photo #29833

#29833, nearby

Rating: 0

Very well hidden sign to the cycle store at Stow Court - Stow cum Quy - presumably intended for staff, not visitors.

Photo #29609

#29609, nearby

Rating: 0

"Cycles causing an obstruction to vehicle parking spaces will be removed and destroyed without warning under Rail Byelaws." I'm used to seeing mean spirited and unfriendly anti-cyclist signage at the railway station. But this sign indica ... [more]

Photo #29265

#29265, nearby

Rating: 0

Eh? This is a byway. No bikes?

Photo #30013

#30013, nearby

Rating: 0

Surely they mean 'Be Aware of cyclists'? Sadly the 'Beware' signs are repeated in many locations around Rugby.

Photo #29038

#29038, nearby

Rating: 0

That should be 'Left turn only - except bikes'.

Photo #31159

#31159, nearby

Rating: 0

Unhelpful signage for NCN50 in centre of Crick village. The route dog-legs across Main Road but is only signed at one of the junctions . Anyone following this will soon find themselves on the A428 to West Haddon, rather than the correct r ... [more]

Photo #28852

#28852, nearby

Rating: 0

You can't see the context here, but were you in a position to obey this sign, you would have been cycling the wrong way up the road.

Photo #28576

#28576, nearby

Rating: 0

Cycling prohibited on the shared use path on the Hinckley bypass (Normandy Way). Blue signs are only advisory so presumably the red cycling prohibited sign trumps the blue one for this section. Welcome to Leicestershire 2011 - yes to ... [more]

Photo #28450

#28450, nearby

Rating: 0

Bizarre five-metre gap in the cycle route parallel to the main road into Holyhead. Is this what was really intended?

Photo #28487

#28487, nearby

Rating: 0

Unnecessary cycling ban on the Promenade, Caernarfon.

Photo #28335

#28335, nearby

Rating: 0

Along with hoodies, alcohol, and dogs - bicycles are prohibited from being taken into this surgery! I can't see any obvious cycle parking, except perhaps the railings for this access ramp.

Photo #28195

#28195, nearby

Rating: 0

There should be some indication that this road leads to the new Whittlesford to Sawston cycle path.

Photo #28183

#28183, nearby

Rating: 0

The sign in #28182 says No Through Route, this says dead end except for access to hospitals - both should make it clear that this is a through route for cyclists.

Photo #28182

#28182, nearby

Rating: 0

Nonsense! It's a through route for cycles (even if they have to detour briefly onto the roadway at the moment).

Photo #28124

#28124, nearby

Rating: 0

The best 20 mph sign in Cambridge. The Council(s) wasted money (I'll find a quote) installing this sign which (a) faces the wrong way up Sidney Street---a one-way street and (b) even if pedal cycles were allowed to contraflow down Sidney St ... [more]

Photo #28034

#28034, nearby

Rating: 0

Advisory 'Cyclist Dismount' signs imposed by the county council's lawyers - if cyclists really did dismount it would grind to a halt in the rush hour, but weekend dog-walkers don't see it this way.

Photo #28033

#28033, nearby

Rating: 0

Advisory 'Cyclist Dismount' signs imposed by the county council's lawyers - if cyclists really did dismount it would grind to a halt in the rush hour, but weekend dog-walkers don't see it this way.

Photo #28001

#28001, nearby

Rating: 0

Rather grim signs - prohibiting play.

Photo #27952

#27952, nearby

Rating: 0

The Cyclists Dismount has reappeared under these cycle route signs.

Photo #27861

#27861, nearby

Rating: 0

I noticed these new signs have appeared along these railings - reading: NO BICYCLES (may be removed at owner's expense) Rather than providing adequate cycle parking for their pupils this Sixth Form college is discouraging cycling and ... [more]

We welcome your feedback, especially to report bugs or give us route feedback.

My comments relate to: *





Your comments: *
URL of page: * http://www.cyclestreets.net/photos/signs/bad/all.html
How did you find out about CycleStreets?:
Your name:
Our ref:

* Items marked with an asterisk [*] are required fields and must be fully completed.