Donate using PayPal


Photo number:
Photo #36146

The orignal sign has deteriorated badly (see #34986 and #35747). The replacement already has a chip out of it, but why was it layed before the old one was removed?

The first signs of this kind (see #21171) are still in good shape. Is the Council now using a cheaper method, or are they unable to cope with the much greater foot fall in town centre?

Comments reflect the views of the original submitter only.

We welcome your feedback, especially to report bugs or give us route feedback.

My comments relate to: *

Your comments: *
URL of page: *
How did you find out about CycleStreets?:
Your name:
Our ref: Please leave blank - anti-spam measure

* Items marked with an asterisk [*] are required fields and must be fully completed.