Donate using PayPal

jimchisholm

Photos

Showing items 1 to 46 from total of 46 items. Ordered by location # descending.

Location # Icon Video Photo Caption Categorisation
90560Photo #90560Bike stands at Ferry Terminal on R(h)um. Tracks a bit rough for BromptonCycle parking:
Good practice
cycleparking
86046Photo #86046Vehicles obstructing MCLObstruction:
Problem
obstructions
86045Photo #86045Builders vehicles obstructing MCLOther:
Infrastructure
general
86044Photo #86044Builders vehicles obstructing MCLOther:
Infrastructure
general
86043Photo #86043Builders vehicles obstructing MCLObstruction:
Problem
obstructions
86042Photo #86042Builders vehicle obstructing MCLObstruction:
Problem
obstructions
86041Photo #86041Builders Vehicles obstructing MCLObstruction:
Problem
obstructions
86040Photo #86040Other:
Infrastructure
general
84221Photo #84221This is Nowhere (Norfolk)General sign/notice:
Misc
signs
74193Photo #74193Filtered Impermeability ... A good short cut avoiding lots of bus stops. Civil Enforcement effectively deals with cars parked hereRoad environment:
Infrastructure
road
71109Photo #71109Francis Crick Avenue 20mph limit sign reading 28Enforcement:
Problem
enforcement
70448Photo #70448Addenbrooke's end of path to Shelford is 3.5mOther:
Infrastructure
general
70447Photo #70447Cambridge Guided Bus path 3m insufficient with busy mixed use Note new lightingOther:
Infrastructure
general
70446Photo #70446The Busway route towards the Cambridge Biomedical CampusCycleway:
Infrastructure
cycleways
70445Photo #704453m path on Cambridge Guided Bus route. Note new lighting for pathOther:
Infrastructure
general
67209Photo #67209Lighting columns being installed on Guided Busway pathOther:
Good practice
general
66490Photo #66490New Bit. NCN11 Shared-use. Family groups need space especially with young ridersOther:
Infrastructure
general
66489Photo #66489Coe Fen. Shared-use. 3.0m Still tight when two bikes pass and there is also a pedestrianOther:
Infrastructure
general
66487Photo #66487Coe Fen Shared-use 2.25m. need to single out not sociable. Can't even chat to child in rear seatOther:
Infrastructure
general
66486Photo #66486Coe Fen. Shared-use 2.25m widening to 3.0m Cycles needed to single outOther:
Infrastructure
general
66485Photo #66485Coe Fen NCN11 Shared-use. 1.6m You need to look behind you just to walk next to your childOther:
Infrastructure
general
66484Photo #66484Coe Fen NCN11 Shared-use. At 1.6m there is no room for cyclesOther:
Infrastructure
general
66483Photo #66483Coe Fen Shared-use 2.25m Family group meets walkers whilst passing othersOther:
Infrastructure
general
66482Photo #66482Coe Fen. Shared-use 2.25m Family Group with mother 'protecting' youngest. What if they met another?Other:
Infrastructure
general
66481Photo #66481Shared-use NCN11 2.5m Caution needed if approaching walkers from the rear
(they'd 'just' moved across as they thought they were spoiling my photo, and hadn't seen or heard the bikes)
Other:
Infrastructure
general
66480Photo #66480NCN11 shared-use 2.5m just enough room for two-abreast walking when you can see the oncoming riderCycleway:
Infrastructure
cycleways
66479Photo #66479NCN 11 on 'New Bit' Shared-use 2.5 m. enough to ride two-a-breast if no others aroundOther:
Infrastructure
general
66478Photo #66478New Bit. Shared-use 1.6m path. When social walking there is little room for safe cyclingOther:
Infrastructure
general
66477Photo #66477CGB shared-use path. Regular use by people towing child trailers requires more than 3m especially where visibility is limited (Long Road underpass)Other:
Infrastructure
general
66476Photo #66476CGB shared use path. 3m on a bend. Needs more width where visibility limitedOther:
Infrastructure
general
66475Photo #664753m wide (kerb to kerb) underpass beneath Long Road. Pedestrians single out for rider who rang bell. Poor visibility an issueOther:
Infrastructure
general
66474Photo #66474Link to Long Road from CGB path 2.75m wide path pedestrians naturally walk to one side, but riders singledOther:
Infrastructure
general
66473Photo #66473NCN11 2m wide shared-use. Parents (tandem) with small child. Not wide enough to meet others in safetyOther:
Infrastructure
general
66472Photo #66472NCN11 With a 2m shared-use path both pedestrians and riders need to single out. Easy when you meet, not easy when you overtakeOther:
Infrastructure
general
66434Photo #66434Cattle grids permit easy access for cycles to routes over the commons, but not easy access for cattle to the roadsObstruction:
Event
obstructions
64940Photo #64940Delayed on trip into Cambridge along busway path. Less that 2 miles from City CentreOther:
Misc
general
64490Photo #64490Tangle of services under new cycle lane. If this were a bus lane, would they need to be moved at great expense.Roadworks:
Infrastructure
roadworks
64489Photo #64489First 'Cambridge Kerbs' in Hills Rd. 20mm rise in 125mm, will segregate motor traffic from cycle laneRoadworks:
Infrastructure
roadworks
62652Photo #62652Good use of old concrete farm road over M11 accommodation bridge now allowing those on foot or cycle to avoid the nearby M11 J11Other:
Good practice
general
62651Photo #62651Who wouldn't drive to the huge M-S car park when this is walking/cycling alternative?Pothole:
Problem
potholes
53764Photo #53764HGV parked in car bays totally obstructing cycle laneObstruction:
Problem
obstructions
53763Photo #53763Another HGV parked in car baysObstruction:
Problem
obstructions
53761Photo #53761Encroaching into cycle laneObstruction:
Problem
obstructions
19276Photo #19276The gaps on Hills Rd bridge are just large enough for the street sweeperOther:
Good practice
general
17055Photo #17055Car overtaking cyclist on Hills Road bridgeEnforcement:
Event
enforcement
17054Photo #17054Red Car overtakes cyclist in 3.0 lane on Hills Rd BridgeOther:
Problem
general

We welcome your feedback, especially to report bugs or give us route feedback.

My comments relate to: *






Your comments: *
URL of page: * https://www.cyclestreets.net/users/jimchisholm/photos/
How did you find out about CycleStreets?:
Your name:
Our ref: Please leave blank - anti-spam measure

* Items marked with an asterisk [*] are required fields and must be fully completed.